Most of us have heard of the conspiracies involving 911, the assassination of John F. Kennedy, Barack Obama’s birth certficate and the story that the U.S. moon landing was a hoax. The continual and dependable readership and consumer of news has been broken and fragmented into a lot of components that are affected by the diverse emerging technologies, techniques, mediums and gizmos(such as modes of reportage, and dissemination of new data data, affected by the viral soup and stream. Deciding what’s news has taken on a new form and operation, and as the technologies evolve, so will the choice as to what news is be impacted and reflected by the consumers and disseminators of the latter day computer/technological societies we now reside in.
In other words, it is an strategy to media that would be far better characterised as pre rather than post-McLuhanite (in the art historical sense of pre-Raphaelite) in that the complete co-implications of human beings and technologies is treated in a monolithic, rather than in a complex way. The function of science and technology in future design and style will be discussed from the viewpoint of a person who has lived all his life in the United States and whose scientific experience has spanned the years given that the late 1930s.
Ultimately, we shall look at the co-evolution of science and society and attempt to draw some conclusions regarding their related future and the implications for the future of technology. The Federal Coordinating Council on Science, Engineering and Technologies identified the current national priority regions as higher-performance computing, advanced components, manufacturing analysis and education, biotechnology and global alter. An account of this very successful and comprehensive system has been presented in the January 24, 1994 issue of Chemical and Engineering News published by the American Chemical Society.
The Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB) in their Newsletter of May, 1993 deemed standard biomedical study and its rewards to society. 1 of the ways that the public is repaid for their assistance is by means of the technologies that fundamental study generates. I suspect that the financial return from technologies alone more than compensates for the monies expended for the entire simple investigation effort. It need to be noted that the public gains significantly far more than the economic worth of technologies.
Advances in technologies are generally accompanied by social changes as a consequence of altering economies and methods of carrying out life’s various activities. An crucial query arises regarding how basic scientific discoveries at some point lead to new technologies and what that might imply to the rational assistance of simple study and the future of science and technologies in the created and creating world. There are fantastic uncertainties in the method that starts with standard study and ends with an economically profitable technology.